TOP 10 Because of traffic and housing problems in the cities, the government encourages businesses (SIÊU HAY)

Because of traffic and housing problems in the cities, the government encourages businesses

Đề bài: Because of traffic and housing problems in the cities, the government encourages businesses to move to the rural area. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

Because of traffic and housing problems in the cities, the government encourages businesses (mẫu 1)

In the past, factories were often built close to city areas as the lack of transportation forbade people to do otherwise. However, this is not exactly the case today, when industries and businesses are moving from municipal and into countryside areas in flocks. This essay will elaborate on both positive and negative effects of this trend.

On the positive side, firstly, this movement makes perfect environmental sense. Due to industrial activities, residents of many cities around the world are still breathing in air and consume water dirty enough to cause numerous health diseases. Therefore, moving businesses out of the cities will rid human and other species of pollution. A further advantage of this trend is reducing the gap between the rich and the poor in a country, as countryside dwellers can opt to work in factories with higher pay, rather than agricultural work. This will eventually bring about peace and harmony to society.

On the negative side, doing business in the countryside also represents some notable drawbacks. To begin with, skilled workers are a rarity in rural areas. Most people living in small towns and villages do not receive sufficient education to undertake intellectual jobs. What is also disadvantageous is based in regional areas, companies risk distancing themselves further from their customers, their suppliers and other partners in their business transactions, which can weaken their profitability.

In conclusion, moving business from cities to rural areas can be a smart decision. However, there are disadvantages that should be weighed carefully against the advantages.

Because of traffic and housing problems in the cities, the government encourages businesses (mẫu 2)

Traffic and housing in urban areas is a common problem in the contemporary world. In reaction to the issues, governments encourage these companies to relocate to suburban areas. In my opinion, this coping strategy has more benefits than drawbacks.

One of the primary advantages of encouraging companies to move to rural areas is the potential relief of urban congestion. Urban centres are often characterized by heavy traffic, leading to increased pollution and decreased quality of life for residents. If these companies can be resettled in areas outside of cities, traffic problems can be eased, which will effectively reduce exhaust fumes and other toxic gasses. This, in turn, enhances the overall living conditions for urban dwellers. Additionally, the relocation of businesses to rural areas can address housing problems in cities. Overcrowded urban spaces contribute to skyrocketing property prices and a shortage of affordable housing. When businesses move to rural areas, the demand for housing in urban centres may decrease, stabilizing property markets and providing citizens with more accessible housing options. This can contribute to a more equitable distribution of resources and opportunities among urban and rural populations.

However, it is essential to acknowledge the potential disadvantages of this strategy. One significant concern is the impact on urban employment. As businesses relocate, urban workers may face job displacement, leading to unemployment and social challenges. To counteract this, the government must implement comprehensive retraining programs and initiatives to facilitate the transition of the urban workforce to emerging industries and sectors.

In conclusion, the relocation of businesses to rural areas helps tackle urban congestion, addresses housing problems and brings an overall benefit to cities and the countryside. Therefore, I believe these advantages outweigh any disadvantages that will seem less important by comparison.

Because of traffic and housing problems in the cities, the government encourages businesses (mẫu 3)

In today's world, traffic and housing have become one of the most concerning issues. Some individuals believe that due to traffic congestion and housing problems, it is better for businesses to move to rural areas. Although this has many benefits, there are some drawbacks too. I believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, and in this essay, I will discuss the relevant reasons behind this issue.

To begin with, one of the most advantages of moving businesses to rural areas is reducing traffic congestion. In other words, many people go to companies and businesses every day, and they prefer to use their own cars rather than public transportation. For example, each company has a lot of workers, employees, and other staff that make traffic by going to their offices every single day. Therefore, by moving businesses to suburban or rural areas a major part of traffic will decrease and it reduces air pollution in cities. Another major benefit is creating job situations for people living in rural areas. This helps the economic cycle and improves the economic situation. Furthermore, people living in rural areas prefer to stay in their hometowns rather than immigrate to big cities due to the lack of jobs. So, the housing problem will be removed.

Turning to the other side of the argument, one of the biggest disadvantages of moving the businesses outside the city is difficult to access. In this case, people should go to their offices by public transportation or their own cars which is not affordable. For instance, many people are accustomed to going to work by bicycle or they do not have a car. So, it becomes difficult and expensive for them to get to the office outside the city.

To sum up, some think that the government should encourage businesses to move outside the city, while others believe that it has many drawbacks. Although moving businesses to rural areas have a major role in traffic congestion and housing problems, it makes access to business difficult.

Because of traffic and housing problems in the cities, the government encourages businesses (mẫu 4)

It is prevalent that governments are recommending firms to relocate to the countryside to alleviate issues regarding transport and housing in urban areas. Although this tendency poses a threat to the environment and may result in a shortage of skilled labour in rural areas, the benefits including more job opportunities for local people and the narrowed wealth gap between regions are more significant.

On the one hand, there are two drawbacks associated with encouraging enterprises to move to the countryside. The first is that it can trigger environmental damage in the area. This is explained by the fact that industrial activities implemented by these companies often release a substantial amount of waste. If such businesses pay scant attention to proper waste treatment, more untreated waste could be discharged into local water bodies and land, contaminating the living areas of rural residents. Another demerit is the lack of highly qualified labour. More specifically, as most people living in small towns and villages are less likely to receive sufficient education to pursue more intellectually involved professions, firms in such places often find it challenging to recruit skilled employees.

On the other hand, the relocation of corporations to the hinterland offers more noticeable benefits. The first one is there can be more employment opportunities for rural dwellers. To be more specific, although it may be hard to employ white-collar workers, businesses can still provide jobs for numerous blue-collar ones. As a result, they can acquire higher income and have a better quality of life. Additionally, this can minimise the financial gap between rural and urban areas. This is because an increasing number of companies operating in the countryside can enable the rural economy to thrive and attract more foreign investment, thus discouraging more people from residing in big cities.

In conclusion, I completely agree that the merits such as the provision of better job opportunities and the narrower financial gap in different areas over the demerits of environmental contamination and the shortage of highly skilled workers because these downsides can be tackled by offering relocation packages to skilled workers to convince them to work in rural regions and rigorous monitoring by environmental agencies to prevent any major environmental harm from discharge of waste.

Because of traffic and housing problems in the cities, the government encourages businesses (mẫu 5)

In large urban areas throughout the world, there has been a rise in accommodation and transport problems. This has caused businesses to consider relocating to rural areas, which can bring both loss and gain. In my opinion, the drawbacks of this decision outweigh the benefits.

Certain advantages exist for businesses which move to the countryside, the first of which is related to profitability. Rural areas tend to have lower property prices, helping businesses to reduce overheads. In some territories where governments provide tax breaks to incentivize rural businesses, it would also be beneficial to relocate one’s firm away from cities. Moreover, if companies start operating more in the countryside, more employment opportunities could be created for rural residents. This would certainly ease the influx of people migrating to the cities for employment, so overcrowding in urban regions, as a problem, may be alleviated.

However, the disadvantages are nothing to scoff at. One of the issues caused by moving business operations away from cities is the dearth of skilled labor. Rural areas’ usually smaller populations mean that the pool of skilled workers available is more limited. This would hamper businesses’ ability to recruit the right people, as a result. Additionally, businesses which decide to relocate to the countryside may experience transportation difficulties that staff from urban areas will have trouble commuting. This is due to the change in traveling distance and more limited transportation options. Many of those workers, consequently, might try to leave the company if such a decision becomes official. The expenses incurred from retaining employees and training new replacements might end up canceling out any cost saving made.

In conclusion, despite the benefits in cost savings and government incentives, it might ultimately be detrimental for a business to operate in rural areas. As this decision’s disadvantages outweigh the gains, it is best taken cautiously.