TOP 12 Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water (SIÊU HAY)

Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water

Đề bài: Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water as they like. Others believe governments should strictly control the use of fresh water. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water (mẫu 1)

Opinions are utterly divided when it comes to the freedom of freshwater use. While some believe that they should be able to assert their right to the utilization of the resource however they see fit, others argue that states should rigorously monitor how much water is resourced. I side with the latter.

On the one hand, some claim that unlimited access to freshwater is a basic human right. Their rationale is that uncontaminated water is fundamental to the existence of human beings as it is essential for everyday needs, including drinking, cleaning and farming, and government's denying people such a natural entitlement triggers great suffering and distress. Although the pivotal role of water is irrefutable, I disagree that people should be permitted to use as much water as they want since this endorses the wastage of the already scarce and dwindling safe water supplies.

On the other hand, others consider that water usage should be closely governed by the authorities. I concur with this view because promoting water preservation aside, water restriction regulations avert inequitable and unjust access to water for all members of the population. In other words, if the government did not introduce a rigid cap on water consumption, impoverished communities, especially those residing in water-stressed regions, would be faced with risks of water deficits due to their low buying power while more endowed families could exploit and even squander the limited resource.

In conclusion, while there is no doubt that freshwater is vital to the survival of humankind, I do not agree that people should have unrestricted access to it. Instead, it is suggested that the use of water be carefully managed by the states to ensure water conservation and fair distribution.

Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water (mẫu 2)

Clean water is the most essential thing we need to survive. One group of people believes that they can use fresh water without any restrictions. Whereas others opine that it is a limited resource on the planet. So, the government should impose some strict rules to reduce the use of fresh water. Both have their own pros and cons. Before I comment on my view, both must be discussed in the following paragraphs.

On the one hand, many individuals believe they have the right to use pure water as much as they want. The first and foremost reason is that it is a natural resource which is owned by no one. This means that people have the freedom to use it without worrying about anyone others. One another reason is that it is available free of cost. People do not need to pay any charges to use fresh water. For example, the Narmada River contains fresh water and is easily available in most places. Everyone can use that water for their daily needs without prohibition.

On the other hand, some people opine it is limited. Higher authorities should do everything possible to control excessive freshwater use. This is because the amount of water that we can use in our household activities and for drinking purposes is limited. As per one survey, we have only 2% of fresh water on this earth; the other part of the water is not useable for human life. If people use more water and waste it, it will be a problem for future generations, and they will face a shortage of clean water.

In conclusion, although water is a natural resource and completely free, the government should take some steps to reduce excessive use of it because it is a limited resource.

Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water (mẫu 3)

There are differing opinions in regard to the freedom to use fresh water. Some believe citizens should have the right to use fresh water freely, while others assert that the state should regulate the amount of fresh water citizens can use. This essay will discuss both of these arguments and explain my thoughts on why the government should manage the use of freshwater.

On the one hand, some see the right to fresh water as a basic human necessity. According to the UN’s International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the right to water is an essential human right and all signatory nations of the covenant must ensure that their citizens have unrestricted access to fresh water. Thus, the governments of those nations are obliged to guarantee that their citizens can use fresh water in any amount to meet their fundamental needs such as cooking, cleaning and drinking. If citizens are not afforded adequate access to fresh water, it would be tantamount to an infringement on human rights and these citizens will suffer greatly as a result.

On the other hand, others believe fresh water is a scarce resource and should therefore be controlled by the state. The global supply of fresh water is dwindling with each passing decade due to numerous factors such as the greater frequency of droughts and the increasing demand from a growing population. According to the UN’s estimation, the majority of the world population will reside in water-stressed regions by the end of the 21st century. Hence, the scarcity of fresh water should be addressed by the government through the promulgation of policies and regulations intended to prolong the supply of water in the long term.

In conclusion, I believe that though people should have access to an adequate amount of fresh water for their survival, the state should intervene in not letting some people use too much water as this can lead to others not having enough of it.

Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water (mẫu 4)

Water is a vital natural resource that nature has bestowed upon humanity. While some believe that freshwater usage should be regulated by the government, others believe that it should be accessible for people to consume as much as they wish. In this paper, I would discuss both points of view in depth and present examples to show why the first assertion is correct.

There are two reasons why advocates feel that freshwater should be plentiful for the general public. First and foremost, fresh water is a basic human requirement for everyday activities and should be given at no cost. Different functions, such as drinking, washing clothing, bathing, and so on, are basic necessities for every individual without which they would perish. Furthermore, they believe that governments should ensure that rainwater collection pits are built at appropriate locations in order to boost groundwater availability during the rainy season.

Others, including myself, believe that strong policies should steer people in the proper direction to utilise water in a restricted manner in order to save it for future generations. Pure water amenities are enjoyed by only the wealthier communities due to a lack of good administration, leaving the poor in the lurch. Aside from that, the mismanagement of this natural resource is a contributing factor. For amusement and enjoyment, many resorts and hotels, for example, use millions of gallons in games and swimming pools.

To summarise, many individuals believe that government laws should manage freshwater distribution, while others believe that there should be no price for using it. I totally agree that local governments should rigorously supervise its use because it is a basic need for everyone and should be shared equally between the affluent and the poor.

Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water (mẫu 5)

Certain people believe that with the backing from the Constitution, they can overuse water, while some people think that water is a limited resource, so the government needs to regulate its usage. In my opinion, I agree that the government should regulate it. This essay will highlight both sides.

On the one hand, the government controlling the usage of water will infringe on the rights of the people. This is because it is their legal right to have access to and use water that is naturally given. The government regulating free water will deprive others of being able to use as much as they want. Moreover, controlling fresh water would incur costs for the users. In order for the state to manage freshwater, taxes and sanctions will be imposed. This will increase the costs of industries and the poor people in the community.

On the other hand, water usage needs to be controlled to enhance its sustainability. Since water is a limited resource, the state must ensure that it is sustainable for future generations. This calls for the checkout of people who misuse the water and pollute it. For instance, this can be done by the government imposing higher taxes on the water to prevent over or misuse of our fresh water. Again, the state will gain revenue when fresh water is regulated. Freshwater regulations will bring much income to the government because people will pay for its usage, especially large industries which use much water every day.

To conclude, water is essential for our lives. I believe that the government should control fresh water because its benefits, such as sustaining water and revenue, supersede the problems that may arise.

Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water (mẫu 6)

Water scarcity has become a major problem in the modern day, which poses the question of whether people should still have free access to fresh water. Although some people argue that it is their right to use water as they choose, I believe it is more beneficial if there are restrictions on water use.

On the one hand, proponents of the idea that people should be able to freely use water often state several reasons. Firstly, it is not always people's fault that water is wasted. In some countries, bureaucracy, mismanagement and corruption are the main factors that jeopardize the water supply. Therefore, it is unjustifiable to force people into saving resources that they do not waste in the first place. Secondly, it is the responsibility of the state to ensure that its citizens have access to fresh water. The government should use taxpayers' money to promote sustainable water management and improve the sewage system, allowing them to supply and recycle water in a way that meets current needs without affecting future generations.

On the other hand, other people believe that water shortages will become more severe without government intervention. A large number of people still think that fresh water is an unlimited natural resource. Setting maximum limits for water consumption or punishing those who overuse water would surely raise people's awareness of the dire consequences of abusing water resources, thereby discouraging them from misusing water. In addition, only the government has a deep understanding of its current water situation. Therefore, only they can take action accordingly to prevent drought and other emergencies that water shortages can cause.

In conclusion, although household water use might not be the main culprit of water shortages, I firmly believe that the government should control and regulate the water supply in order to encourage efficient water use and protect the country from disaster.

Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water (mẫu 7)

Fresh water is essential for living organisms on Earth as it is a vital resource necessary for survival. However, fresh water is not an unlimited resource, leading to scarcity in various regions globally. This essay will examine perspectives on access to fresh water and present my perspective on both viewpoints.

The first viewpoint argues that individuals should have the right to use fresh water as they please. Water is universally accessible for individual use and plays a crucial role in daily life. The high demand for fresh water can be met by the Earth’s surface, which is covered by 70% water, and advancements in technology that can convert water into potable water. I concur with this perspective as previously mentioned, as fresh water is a vital resource that is abundantly available.

On the other hand, the second viewpoint suggests that governments should strictly control the use of fresh water due to its limited nature. The scarcity of fresh water poses a significant challenge in numerous regions, notably in Africa. Whenever fresh water is supplied to the region, government regulation of distribution ensures equitable access among households. While this approach may be suitable for regions facing severe scarcity like Africa, I find it less applicable in areas where fresh water resources are more abundant.

In conclusion, while fresh water is a finite resource that needs to be managed carefully, I believe that a balance can be struck between individual access and government regulation to ensure fair and sustainable use of this essential resource.

Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water (mẫu 8)

One of the most controversial issue today relates to Use of water resources. While many individuals consider that people have the unrestricted right to use water as they wish, some people tend towards the viewpoint that water resource should be controlled by the government due to its limitation.In this essay, I am going to examine both points of view and provide my own opinion.

On one hand, there are people who argue that people's water needs should not be restricted. The main reason for believe this is that this proportion of people tend to emphasis the individual rights and personal freedom. To be more specific,it means that they hold the viewpoint that fresh water is a natural resource accessible to all, and individuals should have the right to use it freely.

On the other hand, the opposite argument is that the government should control the use of fresh water as it is a limited resource.Limited water resources can never meet the infinite demand of human beings for them. Meanwhile, many people lack the awareness of water conservation, and the shortage of water resources is becoming more and more serious. Therefore, the strict control of the government is of great significance.As the management coordinator of the whole society, the government is also the most capable and likely to solve social problems. It can control the use of water resources by setting up stricter laws and providing relevant penalties.

In conclusion, although it might seem sensible for some people`opinion about no restrictions on water use, i personally prefer governments should implement effective conservation measures to ensure the sustainability of water resources

Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water (mẫu 9)

Whether citizens should be allowed to use fresh water freely or governments should put restrictions on the amount of fresh water citizens can have access to has gained traction. In my opinion, while each view has its merits, I agree that water usage should be regulated.

On the one hand, being able to use fresh, clean water is a human's basic necessity. First, besides food, water is another fundamental contributing to human well-being. Therefore, if people were not to get an adequate amount of water to sustain basic activities such as hydrating themselves, cooking, and cleaning, their human rights would have been violated. Secondly, people have varying needs for water so restricting the amount of water used to an average number would be disadvantageous to those whose businesses involve heavy water usage, for example, people involved in farming activities.

On the other hand, introducing regulations on fresh water usage can have undeniable positive effects. Water is a scarce resource, so making it freely available can lead to depletion of fresh water and unequal distribution of water. As a matter of fact, water sources have been depleting in recent years due to global warming, droughts, and pollution. Consequently, if individuals are free to use water at their own discretion, it will lead to faster exhaustion of this rare resource. Another grave effect is that people in some countries who have difficult access to fresh water will have to receive less as people in other countries have used it extravagantly.

By and large, I opine that despite water being a common property, people should not be given unlimited usage of that resource but should rather follow the government’s regulations and distribution.

Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water (mẫu 10)

There have been conflicting views on whether the use of freshwater should be controlled or not. In my opinion, government regulations on water usage should be put in place so that this limited natural resource can be utilized in an equitable manner.

The proponents of unrestricted access to water may view it as a fundamental human right. They may believe that they are entitled to use as much water as they see fit for their daily activities, such as taking long showers or leaving the tap running when brushing their teeth. Restricting their water consumption is a violation of their human rights. However, I think these are selfish individuals who fail to consider the impact of their actions on the larger global community.

On the other hand, there are those who argue that water should be managed as a limited natural resource in order for it to be distributed equitably across the globe. To be specific, many regions are facing recurrent droughts, and people there are experiencing a water shortage. Therefore, conservation is necessary to ensure that everyone in the world has access to this limited resource. After all, water is crucial to human survival and, without it, many people would become sick and even die. I agree that the government should regulate the use of freshwater. Otherwise, there will always be individuals who waste water and disregard the needs of those living in arid areas.

In conclusion, although free access to freshwater is a basic human need, I believe controlling its usage is necessary to secure its equitable distribution among all people on earth.

Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water (mẫu 11)

There is debated among two parties whereas the public or the government should be responsible of fresh water as it is a limited resource on earth. If the public have the power over the fresh water than it will be a waste of resource because of unawareness about how important it is for mankind. From my perspective, I strongly believe that the governements are the ones who should hold the right to its.

To begin with, the public always have their personal freedom to use fresh water as the water is significant to their daily life, for instance,an individual needs to remain hydrated by consuming a lot of aqua or maintained good hygiene by showering with clean water. As we can see, every household have their own water supplies but not all countries such as third world class has such supplies due to its limitation. Therefore, this is crucial for the role of the public to use the resources when it is only necessary.

On the other hand, when it comes to the government, they should set a strict regulation regarding the usage of the fresh water in order to avoid depletion of natural resources. For example, monitor the utilization of water to prevent exceeded daily use.This is because of some people do not have consciousness to appreciate the natural assets that one day will be gone. As a result, the government roles play a big part to ensure that the future generations will also have access to fresh water.

In conclusion, while consider the personal freedom is important, it is essential to balance it with some rules. Therefore, the government should play a role in controlling the usage of the fresh water for the future children rather than use it as we please.

Some people think that people should be given the right to use fresh water (mẫu 12)

Access to clean water is widely regarded as a fundamental necessity in every human’s life, and its management has long been a major concern. In fact, opinions differ as to whether water systems should be run by state bureaucrats, or whether unlimited water should be provided to citizens. Considering the complexity of this matter, I would contend that there should be strict regulations on freshwater use.

On the one hand, the idea of unfettered access to fresh water sources is justifiable in a few aspects. This is primarily because water use is recognized as a human right. Lack of safe and affordable water would exert detrimental impacts on people’s health; thus, the water supply should be within reach of every ordinary person for personal and domestic uses. In addition, the universal right to receive water leads to the demand for non-discriminatory distribution of this resource to people around the globe. Supporters of free water usage argue that when something is not available to be charged, there will not be a conflict of interests that harm a specific group of underprivileged population.

On the other hand, there are more compelling reasons why authorities should impose some restrictions on freshwater management. One major cause is that water is a limited resource and is threatened by human industrial activities and climate change. If governments do not step in to control the process of safe water delivery, people might take it for granted, and this will soon be exhausted. Another concern is that people may procure water from unregulated sources that are dangerous to individuals and communities. To tackle this, over many centuries, governments charged citizens to gather and deliver water, which covered the costs of maintaining the water system and ensuring safety standards for drinking-water quality.

In conclusion, while some hold the view that water should be available with no limitation, I firmly believe that suitable government interference would be more beneficial for people’s access to water. It is recommended that citizens participate in the water management board to ensure that the right to water is properly enforced.